BOARD OF SELECTMEN
Natick Town Hall
October 5, 2009
7:00 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman Joshua Ostroff at 7:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Joshua Ostroff, Kristine Van Amsterdam, Carol A. Gloff, John Connolly. Absent: John Ciccariello.
ALSO PRESENT: Martha L. White, Town Administrator; Donna Challis, Secretary
WARRANTS: Payroll warrants were signed by the Board of Selectmen on October 5, 2009 in the amount of $1,705,005.31. This figure was included in total warrants signed by the Board of Selectmen of $8,372,831.23. .
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mr. Ostroff advised that the Chair, John Ciccariello, was out of town and in recognition of the many issues that need all members of the Board another meeting has been scheduled for Friday (October 9) at 8:00 a.m.
Mr. Connolly announced there was a meeting scheduled for October 14, 7:30 p.m. at the VFW on the Viet Nam Moving Wall.
Mr. Connolly also announced that a roast of Veterans’ Agent John MacGillivray, who was leaving Natick, was going to be held on October 7 at the Elks.
INTERVIEW FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
David Parish told the Board that he valued open space and liked Natick and would like to put the two together.
Asked for his understanding of the role of the committee, Mr. Parish responded that it was an opportunity for members to consider open space needs of the Town and make a recommendation to the various committees and boards and try to arrive at a plan.
Mr. Ostroff inquired if Mr. Parish had any relevant experience. Mr. Parish advised that he had been involved in housing and community development planning and had directed programs for some local financial institutions. He served as co-chair of the Natick 360 which gave him an opportunity to look at the town and have an appreciation for it.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to appoint David Parish to the Open Space Advisory Committee.
INTERVIEW FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD
Amanda Loewy stated that she was interested in contributing to the Youth Advisory Board because it allowed teens to fully participate and be an active member of the Town. She highlighted her activities noting that she was a High Honors student, member of the Student council, Speech Team and Earth Club. In addition due to her experience as an award winning public speaker, she had the skills to help the Youth Advisory Board publicize its work. Recently she was honored to be selected National Merit award and First Place state winner of the Veterans of Foreign Wars national speech and essay competition known as “Voice of Democracy”. She was awarded a trip to Washington, DC to meet the President and learn more about the needs of veterans and then went on to speak on behalf of veterans rights at various
events in Massachusetts
Ms. Loewy also noted that she had contributed over 100 hours of work at TCAN and when she played Anne of Anne of Green Gables it was the highest grossing production.
Through all of this she has had contact with youth of all backgrounds and she would like to reach out on behalf of those who were too shy to say something.
Mr. Ostroff commended Ms. Loewy on the great work she had done so far and applauded her service.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to appoint Amanda Loewy to the Youth Advisory Board.
NATICK SERVICE COUNCIL: ONE DAY ALCOHOL LICENSE; BANNER
Representing the Natick Service Council was Benjamin Greenberg.
Mr. Greenberg advised that the Service Council was having an evening at Nouvelle at the Natick Collection on October 24, 2009. As the time slot was filled, a banner was not being requested, but they would need a one day liquor license. All servers were TIPS certified.
A motion was made by Ms. Gloff to grant a one day alcohol license to Benjamin Greenberg on behalf of the Natick Service Council for an event at Nouvelle at Natick Collection on October 24, 2009 from 7:00-11:00 p.m. Seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam and unanimously voted.
ATTORNEY GEORGE RICHARDS: MARY ANN MORSE NURSING HOME EXPANSION
Attorney George Richards representing the Mary Ann Morse Nursing Home appeared before the Board to make a short presentation of what he deemed to be one of the premium projects on the healthcare front. The Mary Ann Morse Nursing Home was proposing a small but significant addition to the home of approximately 10,000 square feet. He turned the floor over to Allen McLean of the Nursing Home to give a brief overview of the project.
Mr. McLean noted that originally he was the Board Chair of the Leonard Morse Hospital when the nursing home was built; however, as a result of a traffic
accident in April when the CEO was killed, he (Mr. McLean) was asked to take on the role of Interim CEO. Mary Ann Morse Nursing Home was a non-profit
organization. Every dollar was plowed back into the facility with the goal of serving the most vulnerable citizens.
Since the Home was designed and built the long-term care has changed and many more options were available. The patients being served were frailer and sicker. The short-term care service has grown a lot and the declining long-term care and the rising short-term care demanded some changes to the facility.
The plan was to put a 10,000 square foot addition on the north end of the building. They wanted to eliminate 3 six bed rooms and convert them into two beds and provide more common space. They would like to have the approval of the Board of Selectmen, but need the consent of the Planning Board and ZBA. It was the Home’s belief that this was conducive to maintaining this as a long-term viable facility in Natick. This was an issue important to the Nursing Home and vital to allowing them to continue to serve Natick residents.
Mr. McLean advised that nothing specific was being sought from the Board of Selectmen.
Mr. Richards added that they needed a couple of variances from the ZBA and needed a special permit from the Planning Board. Tonight’s meeting was just to keep the Board apprised of the project. He noted that he had some representations from the architect and engineering firm if the Board would like to see them.
Mr. Ostroff appreciated the courtesy of Mr. Richards and Mr. McLean coming in but this was not something before the Board of Selectmen and this has not been noticed to the public as an official meeting. He wanted to limit the amount of information developed here and have it developed in the proper forum.
Mr. Richards advised that at 7:30 this evening they would be appearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Next week they would be before the Planning Board followed by the Conservation Commission. They had also met with the immediate abutters to try to address their concerns and looked forward to working with them.
Mr. Ostroff reiterated that he would rather not get this information if it was before another Board but if it needs to come back before the Selectmen, it would be given all the time needed. Mr. Richards did not believe that would be necessary.
JAY BALL & RICHARD CUGINI: REPORT ON NATICK DAYS
Jay Ball, a member of the Natick Days Committee, reported that roughly 5,000-7,000 people were in attendance. He thanked the DPW, Fire, Police and the Recreation & Parks Department for their superb cooperation.
Recreation & Parks Superintendent Richard Cugini told the Board that staff began working on Natick Days six months ahead of time and attributed part of
its success to the sponsors: Boston Scientific, Community Newspaper, Comcast, Fair & Yeager, Deland and Gibson Insurance, Eliot Healthcare
Center, Bernardi Honda, MathWorks, MetroWest Medical Center, Middlesex Savings Bank, Natick Animal Clinic, Natick Federal Savings Bank, Rehab Associates, Roche Brothers, Stop & Shop, Whitney Place, BJ’s Wholesale club, Cognex Corporation, Natick Center Associates.
This year Saturday was rained out and Natick Days was put off until Sunday. The School teams and non-profits took home about $35,000.
Mr. Cugini recounted the events of the day and commended the Police, Fire and DPW for their work. He was looking forward to the 12th annual Natick Days the second Saturday in September of 2010.
Mr. Connolly thought this (Natick Days) was one of Natick’s huge win/wins.
Mr. Ostroff thanked Mr. Ball and Mr. Cugini and all of the Natick Days committee members for their efforts and hard work.
RECYCLING COMMITTEE: EXPANDED BOTTLE BILL
Appearing before the Board were Recycling Committee members Terry Miller and Brinley Vickers.
Ms. Miller thanked everyone for their efforts on Natick Days. It was one of the biggest events for the Recycling Committee.
The Recycling Committee had a busy year and Ms. Miller said she wanted to give the Board a run down. It was a very active committee and great to work with. Events included: Clean your Attic Day in the Spring which was very successful; Compost Bin Day; Community Farm Pancake Breakfast; a float in the 4th of July parade; distribution of water conservation kits on a grant from DEP; helped the DPW on the dissemination of the change in hours at the Recycling Center.
Ms. Vickers spoke of the changes to the leaf pickup due to budget constraints. In the past there were three weeks and now there was one day for each trash collection day beginning with Tuesday, November 15. Every Saturday or Sunday people could bring their yard waste to the recycling center. All the information was available on Natickma.gov.
The Committee was also planning a Natick Recycles week in November with tables setup and were working with the Boston Marathon people. They hoped to reach out to local businesses to help them go green.
Mr. Ostroff noted that when the Board received an application for a common victualer’s license it included a recycling questionnaire. Ms. Vickers noted the committee would be happy to be included and would be grateful for any information shared.
Ms. Vickers continued that tonight they were there to talk about consideration of an expanded bottle bill being discussed at the state level. After extension discussion, it was felt that an expanded bottle bill would be a positive direction for promoting recycling, reducing waste, and
reducing the cost for cleanup. There was widespread support including the Governor. Representative Linsky and Senator Spilka have filed a bill.
She explained that the goal of the bottle bill was to reduce litter from bottles and cans which at the time were mostly beer and soda. Today it was bottled juice drinks and water. This matters because taxpayers pay to pick up municipal waste. A recent litter study has determined that non redeemed bottles and cans were far more likely to end up as municipal waste than those with deposit costs. Unclaimed bottle deposits will come back to the Town in the form of aid. There were also environmental concerns.
Ms. Vickers asked the Board to sign a resolution in support of the expanded bottle bill. There was a public hearing scheduled for October 27 which was why she was asking for the Board’s vote and signature tonight to be included in the newspaper count on Wednesday.
Mr. Ostroff inquired as to what the expanded bottle bill meant for merchants. It was Ms. Vickers’ understanding that HB3515 changed the description of beverage containers, but there would be the same inclusions of how the deposit containers were returned. If you sold it you had to take it back. Small businesses could apply for a waiver.
Ms. Van Amsterdam noted a fact sheet from the industry with arguments against the bottle bill claimed it (bottle bill) would have a detrimental effect on the curbside recycling programs. She thought it would behoove the Town to flush that out a little more for residents. If it just applied to Natick what would it do?
Ms. Vickers felt the Recycling Committee had done its homework. Deposits don’t hurt curbside. It was vice versa. It was targeting litter. The two (curbside recycling and bottle bill) work together to effectively increase recycling rates.
Mr. Connolly found the presentation to be a lot of good information.
Ms. Vickers noted the expanded bottle bill had been in process for a very long time. HB3515 was a good bill. It wasn’t perfect but it was a good bill.
Ms. Gloff moved to sign and support the resolution in support of updating the Massachusetts bottle bill and rather than just the Chair sign that all members sign. Seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam and unanimously voted.
Mr. Connolly questioned if the Board should wait for Mr. Ciccariello to be present or sign without him. He didn’t want it to look like someone was opposed.
Mr. Ostroff didn’t think waiting was an option since the hearing was Wednesday.
Ms. Gloff suggested that a note could be sent saying one member was absent. She saw a lot of plastic bottles that become litter. Mr. Ostroff agreed that it would be good to get as much litter off the streets as possible.
PUBLIC HEARING: STREET ACCEPTANCE
Yorkshire Drive, Ice House Lane, Newfield Drive
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to open the public hearing.
Town Engineer Mark Coviello distributed a handout showing the orientation of the streets to be accepted. He noted that the portion of Yorkshire Drive being accepted was the extension of the existing street. It was extended and a cul de sac created with a four lot subdivision. All of the work has been completed in accordance with the subdivision plans and the Planning Board on July 8, 2009 voted unanimously to accept and recommend it be put forward for acceptance at Town Meeting.
Mr. Connolly inquired if the neighbors and homeowners were happy and Mr. Coviello responded that as far as he knew. The subdivision sat dormant for several years and they pushed last year to get it finished. Notices of tonight’s hearing were sent to the abutters.
There was no one present wishing to speak on the acceptance of Yorkshire Drive.
Mr. Coviello added that the road was built to the Town’s specification and the DPW had the as built plans.
Mr. Coviello described the process for getting a street accepted and noted that this street was part of the definitive subdivision approval process and as long as the developer abides by the permit and built according to specification, the Town would go through this process.
Mr. Coviello advised that this was a nine lot subdivision off Windsor Avenue. All work was completed and the houses were all built. This was a definitive plan filed through the Planning Board and on July 9, 2009 the Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend putting it forward for Town Meeting.
Mr. Connolly asked if the neighbors and homeowners were happy. Mr. Coviello believed so and advised that notices of this public hearing had gone out to the abutters.
Mr. Ostroff asked about sidewalks and Mr. Coviello responded that the sidewalks were rebuilt on Windsor Avenue as part of the mitigation work.
There was no one present wishing to speak on Ice House Lane.
Mr. Coviello explained that the road was not created through the typical subdivision process. It was part of a development that incorporates four condominium trusts. In 2004 a memorandum of understanding was signed among the four condominium trusts and the Town that detailed the work they would be required to perform before the street could go for acceptance. A contractor was hired and the entire drainage system was upgraded, sidewalk
replaced, curbs, and surfaced. It was done in accordance with all DPW specifications.
Mr. Connolly inquired if the residents were happy and Mr. Coviello’s reply was, “yes”. There were several members of the audience that silently indicated their support.
Mr. Ostroff inquired as to what had changed since the spring when this street was going to be put forward. Mr. Coviello advised that some of the paperwork was incomplete and some minor construction work had to be completed. On September 23, 2009 the Planning Board unanimously voted favorable action.
Nancy Lavash a resident of Silver Hill which was a private way off Newfield Drive noted that Newfield was a through way used as a short cut by many and gets a great deal of traffic. Last summer it was rebuilt to meet the Town’s specifications at a cost of $1.1 million paid by the condominiums and apartment complexes. $3.54 million was paid in taxes in FY09 (by condos and apartments) for which they get very little in return – no snow plowing, no trash pickup, and very few children. A large percentage of the residents walk to the train station. It was reasonable for the Town to accept and add a mile to the Chapter 90 reimbursement.
Asked to talk about the Chapter 90 process, Mr. Coviello advised that it was a roadway maintenance funding program based on a formula that took into account the accepted roadway miles, the population, and the through routes. For every road mile that was accepted, it adds to the reimbursement. The Town gets roughly $6,000 a year per roadway mile.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to close the public hearing.
Ms. Van Amsterdam moved to recommend favorable action on Yorkshire Drive (Article 23). Seconded by Mr. Connolly and unanimously voted.
Ms. White asked if the vote could be interpreted as also being favorable action on the warrant articles. Mr. Ostroff thought the Board was doing both. Mr. Coviello noted that the Board was making a recommendation because it was an article before Town Meeting
A motion was made by Ms. Van Amsterdam to recommend favorable action on Article 21 for the acceptance of Ice House Lane. Seconded by Mr. Connolly and unanimously voted.
A motion was made by Ms. Van Amsterdam to recommend favorable action on Article 20 for the acceptance of Newfield Drive. Seconded by Mr. Connolly and unanimously voted.
Article 18 – Abandon a Portion of Drainage Easement – Franconia Avenue
Mr. Coviello advised that the Board had previously signed an easement consent form in 2001 for this Franconia Avenue property that granted a drainage easement. This summer the property owners wanted to expand the
rear of their house and it was discovered that their plans to expand encroached the easement. The property owner had a new easement plan drawn
up which requires the action of the Board of Selectmen and Town Meeting to formally abandon the section no longer needed.
Mr. Connolly asked if everyone was happy and Mr. Coviello responded that he heard no complaints.
A motion was made by Ms. Gloff to support favorable action on Article 18. Seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam and unanimously voted.
Ms. White thanked Mr. Coviello for his work on this matter. It required a lot of one-on-one work with the property owner. It was discovered that the Town had a drain line with no easement and Mr. Coviello negotiated and then again worked with the homeowners to accommodate them at no cost to the Town.
Mr. Ostroff expressed his appreciation.
Article 19 – Acceptance of Sewer Easement: Newfield Drive
Mr. Coviello explained that this was in connection with the street acceptance of Newfield Drive. Newfield Drive was built in four different phases and a sewer line and easements were granted in the development of Newfield Drive that went over the property and couldn’t adequately be shown on the acceptance plan. This was the acceptance of a sewer easement. It was originally constructed for the benefit of the different trusts, but it now took public sewer off Kendall Lane. He recommended favorable action to accept the easement in conjunction with the acceptance of the street.
Mr. Ostroff acknowledged the work of Attorney Bikofsky who represented one or more of the Associations and then asked if Mr. Coviello anticipated needing to take any action with regard to the sewer line. Mr. Coviello responded that the Town had been maintaining it all along. It really was a Town line.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to recommend favorable action on Article 19.
Article 22 – Street Acceptance – Main Street
Mr. Coviello noted that the portion of Main Street not accepted starts at Route 135 went over the tracks and included a small portion thought of as North Main.
In the spring of 2009 Town Meeting appropriated money for survey work for the street acceptance of Main Street with matching funds put forward by Natick Center Associates. During the survey work a lot of conflicts were found; i.e. sidewalks on private property and a portion of the paved way was on private property. With the property owners a determination had to be made of how to deal with it. Should an easement be taken for the roadway and sidewalks or should the property be taken. He was working with Town Counsel and the property owners and the goal was to move it along. Hopefully it would be ready for acceptance in the Spring.
Mr. Ostroff inquired if sufficient funds were available to help finish the survey. Mr. Coviello thought it would depend on the additional work that had to be done. Right now he thought it would be fine.
Mr. Ostroff then inquired as to what it would mean to have Moran Park be accepted as a public way. Mr. Coviello didn’t think it changed the park. Everyone thought of it at one time as Walnut Street but it was found that the acceptance of Walnut Street stopped at the track and the piece that made up Moran Square was just sitting out there. The thought was that it would be best to incorporate it into the acceptance of Main Street.
On a motion by Mr. Connolly, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to recommend referral of Article 22 to the Board of Selectmen.
Article 48 – Amend By-Laws Article 70: Removal of Snow and Ice from the Sidewalk
As the citizen petitioner was sick and couldn’t be here, Mr. Ostroff wanted to wait to take any action. It was his understanding that the petitioner was asking for referral back to the Town Administrator and the petitioner.
POLICE CHIEF
Interim Police Chief Nicholas Mabardy reviewed the minutes of the April 28, 2009 Safety Committee meeting.
Chief Mannix Announced His Plans to Retire: Chief Mannix advised the Safety Committee Members that, in all likelihood, this would be his last Safety Committee Meeting, as he would be retiring on June 30, 2009. He advised Committee Members that in the unlikely event we have enough issues to call another meeting before he retires, he would be happy to Chair another one, but wanted to be sure he thanked each and every Member of the Committee for their hard work and support over the years. The Committee Members thanked Chief Mannix for his 30+ years of dedicated service to our community. Chief Mannix then turned the meeting over to Lt.Lauzon.
The following Safety Concerns Were Brought Forward by Mr. Glen Glater on Behalf of the Natick Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (NBPAC):
- Mr. Glater shared a series of photographs provided to NBPAC. He advised the Committee that Mr. Richard Whalen and Ms. Mary Burke went to the February meeting of the NBPAC with concerns about the safety of the sidewalks and roadways for pedestrians, especially the elderly, as a result of haphazard shoveling and plowing of the sidewalks and roadways. The letter not only dealt with snow issues, but also with general issues around crosswalks, sidewalks and signage. The Committee VOTED in favor of recommending the Board of Selectmen approve the request for marked crosswalks at the following locations:
- North side of Pond Street heading west to Cemetery Street: Sidewalk ends and no crosswalk to other side.
POLICE CHIEF (contd)
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to install the marked cross walks to be located on the north side of Pond Street.
- West side of Marion Street crossing North Avenue.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to install the marked cross walks on the west side of Marion Street crossing North Avenue.
- Bacon Street/Walnut Street playground at 5 way stop.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to install the marked cross walks at the Bacon Street/Walnut Street playground at the five way stop.
- South Natick Dam Park on Library side. Sidewalk along wall and path with benches, both leading to Pleasant Street, no crosswalk to east side of Pleasant Street.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to install the marked cross walks at the South Natick Dam Park on the library side.
Regarding Winter Snow Issues: The Committee agreed that the winter snow issues will have to be addressed when the snow begins to fall next winter, with a careful eye on snowplows.
Regarding “General Sidewalk/Crossing Issues:
- Pedestrian crossing yellow sign at the intersection of Cottage/South Main Street. The sign is barely visible to traffic heading north on South Main Street. Another sign across South Main on the west side would benefit the many people who use the crosswalks at this intersection, for instance, the residents at Coolidge Gardens.
- There is no crosswalk on School Street Extension. There is no sidewalk for the many people to use as they access downtown for such activities as shopping, events at the Common and Library, and Town Hall business.
- First Church of Christ, Scientist, Natick Request for Signs: A letter was received from the Clerk of the church, in follow up of a request made earlier regarding signage. The letter states, in part: “Our church had a directions sign at Lincoln Square which was removed when the state made improvements in that area. We would like to know what the procedures are for replacing the original sign and to also have one installed near the intersection of Union Street and Eliot Street. We are also interested in having a “Church Entrance” sign installed for the northbound lane of Union Street, similar to the one already installed for the southbound lane. With our driveway at the bottom of a hill from both directions, it would seem safer to
have signs in both directions.” The committee VOTED to recommend to the Board of Selectmen that if the church is willing to provide the signs, the town of Natick DPW will put them up.
Ms. Gloff moved approval for a sign to be purchased by the First Church of Christ and installed by the DPW. Seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam and unanimously voted.
- New England Neighborhood Association (NENA) regarding “Neighborhood concerns with regard to the proposed Hess Express: A letter was received from NENA regarding the impact the proposed Hess Express will have on the safety and quality of life in their neighborhood, as well as to make specific recommendations for the Safety Committee to consider and approve:
The committee discussed these issues and VOTED to recommend approval by the Board of Selectmen for the following:
- Restrict Maine and New Hampshire Avenues from Route 9
- The installation of children signs on Vermont, Maine, New Hampshire and Connecticut Avenues.
- The installation of stop signs and stop bars at the intersections of Connecticut and Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Hampshire, and Connecticut and Vermont, as well as Connecticut and Oak Street.
Ms. Gloff was not sure what was being recommended regarding the restriction of Maine and New Hampshire Avenues from Route 9 and needed a little more information. She wasn’t sure if the suggestion was for the streets to be One Way or a sign.
Mr. Ostroff suggested that either he or the Town Administrator would speak with the Community Development Director and get clarification. Chief Mabardy said he would come back to the Board with a clarification.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to install the CHILDREN signs on Vermont, Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut Avenues.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to install STOP signs and stop; bars at the intersections of Connecticut and Massachusetts; Connecticut and New Hampshire; Connecticut and Vermont; and Connecticut and Oak Street.
- Request for a four way stop at the intersection of Curve and Forrest Streets: The committee discussed this requested and VOTED to recommend against it.
Mr. Connolly believed this referred to Forest Ave. Extension and was curious as to why the four way stop was denied. It was a dangerous intersection.
Chief Mabardy advised that he would revisit it at the next Safety Committee meeting and report back.
- Request for a “blind person” sign on Perry Road where it would be visible when you turn onto Perry fron North Main Street: The
- committee agreed that this is a reasonable request and VOTED to recommend to the Board of Selectmen that the installation of a “blind person” sign would be the Safety Committees recommendation.
A motion was made by Ms. Gloff to authorize the installation of a BLIND PERSON sign on Perry Road. Seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam and unanimously voted.
- Request from a resident who lives in Natick Center to Evaluate the Safety of Motor Vehicles Using Plain Street as a Cut Through to Avoid Traffic in the Center of Town: It was agreed by the committee members that this is a speed enforcement issue. No vote was necessary.
- Street Naming Request for South Natick Hills: The committee reviewed the request and VOTED to recommend to the Board of Selectmen that the following street names be approved:
- Allison Way
- Sienna Lane
- Ashley Court
Mr. Ostroff thought there was a process for naming of streets, and Ms. Challis explained that the process was for a change in name.
Chief Mabardy reviewed the minutes of the September 15, 2009 Safety Committee meeting.
NEW BUSINESS:
Lt. Lauzon welcomed Mr. Hladick, as its newest member representing
the Natick DPW along with Mr. Hurley, representing the Natick
Public Schools. Lt. Grassey attend on behalf of Chief Mabardy.
1.Request for “Not a Through Way” signs to be posted on Route 135, at the entrance of Belmore Road, Edwards Road and Lodge Lane, as well as patrol enforcement in this area during rush hour to address motorists who use the turning lanes to pass illegally: A request was received from the West Natick Neighborhood Association (WNNA) for the installation of signs at the above intersections to stop motorists from attempting to use these roads as a cut-through in an attempt to circumvent the Route 135 lights. The committee VOTED to recommend approval of the request for “Not a Through Way” signs on Speen Street at Belmore and Edwards Roads as well as on Lodge Lane. The committee agreed that Mr. Hladick and Lt. Lauzon would visit the area to see if there were any unnecessary signs that could
be removed.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to approve the installation of a NOT A THROUGH WAY sign on Route 135 at the entrance of Belmore Road, Edwards Road and Lodge Lane.
2.Request for “Autistic Child” sign in front of 34 Bennett Street and at the cross of Forest Avenue Extension: A letter was forwarded to the Safety Committee from the Board of Selectmen, requesting the installation of an “Autistic Child” sign. The committee discussed this
request and VOTED to make the recommendation to the Board of Selectmen in favor of erecting “Children” signs in this area. Lt Lauzon and Mr. Hladick will plan to meet in this neighborhood to determine where best to place the signs.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to approve the installation of a CHILDREN sign in front of 34 Bennett Street.
3. Request from residents in the area of Route 135 and Washington Avenue, inquiring about the possibility of setting the signalized intersection to “flash” nightly from 7:00p.m. to 7:00a.m.: Lt. Lauzon, the Traffic Safety Officer, and Mr. Gordon Vantassel, Superintendent of Communications of the Natick Fire Department, brought forward a request that the committee consider the possibility of changing the light sequence in this area to flash at night. Mr. Vantassel (in an email to Lt. Lauzon) stated that we stopped setting lights on “flash” twenty years ago at the direction of Chief Mannix. The committee VOTED to table this request in order to provide Mr. Reffett, town of Natick Community Development Director, an opportunity to research any available traffic studies that may have been conducted
at this intersection as a result of the Route 135 re-construction project. Mr. Reffett will report these findings to the committee at their next meeting.
- Request for Change of Address: A request for an address change was forwarded from the Natick Housing Authority to accommodate the agreement they have with the Natick Service Council to renovate and relocate to a portion of the Coolidge Gardens building’s unused “gym area.” Their occupancy is anticipated to begin in September of 2009. The request is to have the area leased to the Natick Service Council designated as #2 Webster Street (at the corner of Cottage and Webster Street). The committee VOTED to table a recommendation on this issue until the building inspector weighs in on his recommendation. The committee will revisit this issue at its next meeting.
5.Utility Poles Causing a Safety Hazard on Speen Street: Lt. Lauzon sent an email to Joanne O’Leary, at Nstar, regarding the fact that “upward of 17 utility poles on Speen Street, which have been replaced by new poles, but not removed from the areas immediately adjacent to the roadway, some of which have existing utilities on them, that are obstructing the use of the sidewalks and forcing pedestrians out into the roadway. One pole was said to have already been hit and damaged (Boston Edison *87) located directly across from Nottingham Drive, and leaning so far out into the roadway that it has visible signs of being struck by box type commercial vehicles. Lt Lauzon was informed by Ms. O’Leary that “Comcast has transferred its wires onto the new pole. Verizon is next to take action and has
been notified. The committee VOTED to request the attendance of representatives from Nstar Electric, Verizon, Comcast and the Natick Fire Alarm, at the next Safety Committee meeting. Mr. Hladick and Lt. Lauzon also agreed to walk this
area to identify those poles that need to be removed or moved to another location.
Mr. Connolly asked if there had been any news from Nstar and Ms. White advised that there had not. She was trying to remember how long ago
she was told by Joanne O’Leary of Nstar that Nstar would put it as a priority. It was probably a good 1-1/2 months ago it was first brought to Nstar’s attention that this was an urgent matter and it was still unresolved.
Mr. Connolly noted that he saw this pole himself and called Ms. O’Leary and promises were made. He was extremely frustrated with what Nstar says and what they do. They (Nstar) do whatever they want with no recourse whatsoever and he felt Nstar was thumbing its nose at the Board of Selectmen, our citizens, and our safety. The promises made were never kept. He was still waiting to hear from Ms. O’Leary and Ms. White was told the same thing.
Mr. Ostroff stated that he would drive out there and get up to speed on the situation and do additional outreach and see if it should be added to the agenda.
When working with the Chair on setting out future agendas, Ms. White a meeting with the utility companies on double poles has been targeted for the first meeting in November, but this situation was more urgent.
Chief Mabardy told the Board that he has known Ms. O’Leary for 25 years. One problem Nstar had was that when they removed their wires they couldn’t remove that pole until Verizon, Comcast, cable, etc. removed their wires. If the Board was going to have anybody here, it should be everybody.
Mr. Ostroff thought Chief Mabardy’s point was well taken, but in this case he thought the concern was less the time it took to get the wires transferred because that required a lot of coordination but that there was a pole leaning into the roadway that was a danger. That was the responsibility of the company that owned it.
Mr. Connolly commented that Nstar owned the pole and got revenue from everyone that attached and he had no sympathy for Nstar.
Chief Mabardy suggested inviting Nstar, Verizon, Comcast, etc. to the next Safety Committee meeting. The date hadn’t been set but it could be the last Tuesday of this month. Ms. Van Amsterdam suggested that the Board plan on getting an update from the Safety Committee as it relates to this specific pole.
- Request to revisit the pedestrian safety issue in Natick Center: Mr. Ostroff, Town of Natick Board of Selectmen Member, requested the committee revisit some of the suggestions made during a meeting which was held on July 23, 2009 between Mr. Ostroff and Selectmen Connolly, Patrick Reffett, Community Development Director and Lt. Lauzon. The specific ideas proposed at that time included the installation of high visibility blue paint at certain crosswalks on both Main and Central Streets; crosswalk signage where it will be visible; the installation of a “watch
- for pedestrians in x-walk” sign on Route 27 north, at the intersection of Rte. 135; the revision of the parking spaces that impede visibility; and a review of the existing signage that may not be visible or suitable: The committee VOTED to recommend favorably the suggestions recommended by Mr. Ostroff
- and Lt. Lauzon as they pertain to parking in and around the Albanian Orthodox Church at the corner of Washington Street.
- North Avenue. The committee also VOTED to recommend favorably the following six pedestrian safety improvements in and around Natick Center:
- Paint the center of the crosswalks on Main Street at Union Court and South Main Street at Cottage Street with high visibility blue paint.
On a motion by Mr. Ostroff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to paint the center of the crosswalks on Main Street at Union Court and South Main Street at Cottage Street with high visibility blue paint.
- Recommend favorably the installation of electronic pedestrian crossing lights on East Central Street in front of the Town Hall.
On a motion by Mr. Ostroff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to approve the installation of electronic pedestrian crossing lights on East Central Street in front of the Town Hall.
Assuming the cost would rise to the level, Ms. White advised that she intended to add it to the capital plan.
- Recommend overhead illumination of the Town Hall Crosswalk.
Ms. Gloff found this to be an interesting idea but there was no money for it and she didn’t think there was anything to vote until there was a defined plan.
Mr. Connolly noted that DPW Facilities Supervisor Corey Lovett got hit by a car a month ago and other people have said they were almost hit. It was a real safety issue. Mr. Ostroff and he were downtown and saw it regularly. Nothing worked better than writing up a ticket. He knew the Police have been sending that message. It was definitely a huge concern and he thought the Safety Committee came up with an idea to make it better.
- Recommend public education and police enforcement regarding pedestrian crossings.
Mr. Ostroff didn’t think it was in the Board’s domain to direct the Police Department but he would welcome the comments of the Chief and would talk to the Town Administrator.
Chief Mabardy responded that he had written some notes and noted to make increased enforcement a priority.
- Recommend one parking space be removed on Main Street on the southeast corner of South Avenue in front of the Citizen’s Bank, and to move the handicapped parking space one spot south.
Ms. Gloff moved to authorize the removal of one parking space on Main Street on the southeast corner of South Avenue in front of the Citizen’s Bank and to move the handicapped parking space one spot south.
- The construction of signage indicating “watch for pedestrians in crosswalk” on Route 27 northbound as you approach the intersection of Route 135.
A motion was made by Mr. Ostroff to authorize a sign indicating “WATCH FOR PEDESTRIANS IN CROSSWALK” on Route 27 northbound as you approach the intersection of Route 135. Seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam and unanimously voted.
Ms. White questioned why it was just that one. What about traffic going westbound and turning north onto Main Street. Mr. Ostroff advised that there was not a visibility issue. Ms. Gloff noted that in particular people coming north and turning east onto Route 135 seemed to be the biggest problem.
Mr. Connolly referenced the letters from Winter Street residents concerning the speed of traffic and asked that the Safety Committee look into the matter.
- Update on Department Activities
Chief Mabardy distributed and reviewed an organizational chart of the Police Department.
He advised that Lt. Pagliarulo was support services; Lt. Grassey was the executive officer and commander of investigation and information; Lt. Lauzon was operation command plus he has done a commendable job doing operation and traffic.
Just completing his first 100 days as Interim Chief, Chief Mabardy noted that it had been a busy 97 days. The Police Department was the only department in town that was involved in a confluence of events on September 13. There was a major exercise at the Natick Collection, a family walk, Natick Days, dedication at the Jewish War Veterans. The key to any Police Department was collaboration and none of this could have been done without the help of any other agencies.
Chief Mabardy advised that he had assigned Sgt. Vierra to do report review and update the web site. There will be the ability to put forms for the community to access on the web site.
Other activities during his first 97 days included the replacement of the Records Coordinator. There were two full-time resource officers that from feedback seemed to be well received. There was also the implementation of the taser which was a piece of equipment that has
laid dormant for the past two years. Officers were now trained and carried this useful piece of equipment.
Continuing, Chief Mabardy noted that since July 1 he held three team meetings. At these meetings he sought input from everybody in the department whether clerical, dispatcher, patrol officer, or supervisor.
Officers were asked to list areas they felt they could be improved upon and the job listing response policy was revised.
The goal was the best utilization of the department’s assets. There was a need to be more fiscally prudent especially now with the district court being in Framingham and the impact on the overtime and scheduling that creates.
Chief Mabardy advised that the Middlesex District Attorney was asking to hold grand jury hearings in the public safety training center and he was working with the DA’s office on that.
At the last team meeting they were very fortunate to have Ms. White present and people from the MetroWest Medical Center. There was a need to better understand what goes on at the Medical Center, their expectations of the Police Department, and the Medical Center needs to understand what the department can offer them. People were brought in from the stress management team which he felt needed to be offered to people in his department and community. In any business or any organization the most valuable resources were the men and women that work there. He wanted personnel to be challenged and work to optimal level and at the same time be supported.
In conclusion Chief Mabardy thanked the Board of Selectmen and Ms. White for giving him the opportunity to work with and lead an outstanding group of people. It’s been a privilege and they would continue to go forward.
Mr. Ostroff thanked Chief Mabardy noting that the department had gotten a lot of work done for which the Board was grateful.
Ms. Van Amsterdam felt Chief Mabardy seemed proud of the information gleaned from the team meetings and asked if there was anything he could put together for the Board that would describe some of the areas where members felt it would be prudent to move in a certain direction. She clarified that she was talking about at a high level. It would be helpful for the Board to understand, in Chief Mabardy’s words, the key goals and ideas that were important. Was there a theme amongst the comments? She would be curious to know of what the Chief was most proud.
Chief Mabardy responded that he didn’t even have to think about it – it was the people he worked with. Every single person has shown they were dedicated and devoted. The department got along well. They didn’t agree on everything but they talk about it.
Mr. Connolly expressed his appreciation for the work done by Chief Mabardy and the department. Chief Mabardy responded that he was the fortunate one and thanked the Board for the opportunity.
Following a 10 minute recess, the meeting was again called to order at 9:40 p.m.
TOWN MEETING WARRANT ARTICLES
Article 49 – Amend by-Laws Article 72: Building Regulations
The article had been submitted by the Charter & By-Law Review Committee and as chair of the Committee Ms. Gloff explained that only minor changes were being proposed to the Building Regulations was in Section 4 from “an” to “any” and in Section 6 change the title and first sentence to include “or on public property”. The other change corrects “to Building Commissioner”.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Mr. Connolly, the Board unanimously voted to recommend favorable action on Article 49.
Article 52 – Amend By-Laws Article 76: Regulations for the Demolition, Alteration or Relocation of Historically Significant Buildings or Structures
Ms. Gloff highlighted the proposed changes which consisted mostly of grammatical corrections and change in title from Planning Director to Community Development Director and from Building Inspector to Building Commissioner.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Mr. Connolly, the Board unanimously voted to recommend favorable action on Article 52.
Article 54 – Amend By-Laws Article 80: Water Supply Protection
Ms. Gloff noted that some questions were raised regarding items such as cross connections that were not currently covered in the by-laws. At the recommendation of the DPW Director and Environmental Compliance Officer a proposed new paragraph was inserted. The wording was reviewed by Town Counsel.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Mr. Connolly, the Board unanimously voted to recommend favorable action on Article 54.
Article 55 – Amend By-Laws Article 90: Repeal of By-Laws
Ms. Gloff explained that not all by-laws had the severability clause and Town Counsel felt it was appropriate to add a general severability clause.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Mr. Connolly, the Board unanimously voted to recommend favorable action on Article 55.
Article 57 – Amend By-Laws Article 92: Enforcement of By-Laws
Ms. Gloff advised that the Finance Committee recommended an additional change under illegal dumping. They proposed a change from $20 up to $300.
Ms. White noted that several questions arose at the FinCom hearing and she requested an opinion from Town Counsel. She would be meeting with the FinCom Chair tomorrow night.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Mr. Connolly, the Board unanimously voted to recommend favorable action on Article 57.
Article 34 – Amend By-Laws Article 21: Planning Director
Ms. Gloff noted that the Planning Board would be taking up Article 34 at their meeting on Wednesday.
Mr. Ostroff was aware that the Planning Board had some concerns over Article 34.
Article 58 – Amend Zoning By-Laws: Renewable or Alternative Energy Manufacturing & Research & Development
Ms. White informed the Board that this by-law was being put forward in furtherance of Natick’s effort to be designated as a green community which would make the Town eligible and more competitive for a number of state grants. The Town already met two of the five criteria and this would get us up to three of the five. It was recommended by both the Planning Board and Finance Committee.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to recommend favorable action on Article 58.
Article 48 – Amend By-Laws Article 70: Removal of Snow and Ice from Sidewalks
Mr. Ostroff noted that this article had been put forward by a citizens petition. The overall intent was to promote greater safety through making individuals responsible for shoveling the sidewalks and hydrants in front of their property. At the FinCom hearing the lead petition was clear that the article needed more work and requested that it be referred back to the Town Administrator and her.
There were clearly a lot of questions raised at the hearing, but Mr. Ostroff applauded the petitioner for bringing it forward. Perhaps it could be brought back in the spring.
Although many articles relating to the charter & by-laws were not proposed by the committee, Ms. Gloff advised that this concept was brought to the committee. It was discussed several times at substantial length and the committee decided not to support it. Primarily they were concerned about the ability of a number of citizens to comply – the elderly or disabled or someone who just had a bad back. She noted that she (Ms. Gloff) hadn’t been able to find someone to shovel her sidewalk from the driveway to the house and she hadn’t been able to do it.
Mr. Ostroff shared that concern, but there were other communities where a program like this worked. There were many sidewalks that were not plowed that created a hazard. He would support referral.
Mr. Connolly echoed Ms. Gloff’s comments regarding people with disabilities and senior citizens and he felt uncomfortable punishing someone for not doing it. He didn’t know how to make it fair and equitable.
Mr. Ostroff advised that the Finance Committee was meeting tomorrow night and that was probably the last meeting. He noted that the Finance Committee voted approval of the article on restaurant parking, but the Planning Board had some concerns and would be taking it up Wednesday night. It may or may not make it into the FinCom book.
Ms. White added that the FinCom was trying to hold the book until after the Board’s meeting on Friday morning to add the one line of the Selectmen’s recommendations.
Mr. Ostroff noted that the FinCom recommendations would be available on line in about a week.
RAILBANKING EXTENSION
Ms. White explained that yet another 180 day extension of the deadline for negotiations with CSX was being sought. Essentially the draft before the Board was the same request as before but changed to the extent that she was now working on arranging a meeting with CSX.
A motion was made by Ms. Van Amsterdam to approve the request for a 180 day extension. Seconded by Ms. Gloff.
2010 LICENSE FEES; PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION
Mr. Ostroff reported that he had had some discussion about developing an installment plan for the alcohol licenses, but that was much easier said than done and he didn’t see how it could be done without costing the Town a lot of resources it couldn’t spend.
Ms. Gloff remembered that during the charter & by-law review process one or two things were identified that maybe should be licensed but weren’t being licensed. Ms. White had the same recollection, but couldn’t remember the specific licenses.
If the Board were to call for a public hearing on October 19 to consider the license fees and in the interim determined there were one or two others, could they be added or did they have to be identified tonight. If it was discovered that there was one or two others, Mr. Ostroff suggested that the Board could hold a public hearing for that one or two.
No motion was made to schedule a public hearing to consider changing the fees.
EAST SCHOOL LEASE
In a memo to the Board Ms. White advised that the lease for the former East School with Westgate Christian Academy expires on July 31, 2011 and the Selectmen had the authority to solicit proposals for a new 10 year lease term.
The Board had asked Ms. White to inquire of other municipal departments whether they had any possible school/municipal use or need for this facility. She reported that she discussed with the Superintendent the possibility of the School Department utilizing the building construction of a new high school. However, the timing did not make sense.
Ms. White said she would, therefore, urge the Board to move forward with the issuance of the RFP a copy of which was given to the Board. She pointed out that the proposed RFP provides that the basis for award would be the best price among proposals for a use that was permitted as of right under the Zoning By-Law. For this site she thought that was
an acceptable and expedient approach. She noted that the RFP still needed to be reviewed by Town Counsel before issuance.
Ms. Van Amsterdam stated that she was in favor of moving forward and asked Ms. White to describe her conversation with the School Department
in order to answer questions from the public that all possibilities were explored.
Ms. White responded that the wing of the high school based on the current plans and site selection would need to be demolished to make room for the new construction and certain classrooms and operations would need to be relocated. One concept was to use the East School but with the duration of this lease and the proposed schedule for the high school it didn’t work. The Schools were looking at one or two alternatives: 1) temporary modular classrooms; 2) St. Patrick’s School. The only use the Superintendent proposed for East School would be the temporary relocation of students during construction.
Mr. Ostroff inquired if there was a possibility realizing a greater return if the lease was longer than 10 years. Ms. White thought that might be the case, adding that she viewed the East School differently than the Eliot School. That building (Eliot) needs more of a significant capital investment than East School. For Eliot an authorization to lease up to 99 years or sell made a lot of sense because nobody would make that kind of capital investment in the facility without a long-term right, but the capital needs for East School were not that great.
Mr. Ostroff asked if Ms. White had spoken with the Chair John Ciccariello and she advised that she had. As Mr. Ciccariello was aware of this being on the agenda, Mr. Ostroff saw no reason to delay.
Mr. Connolly moved to issue the RFP for the East School upon approval of Town Counsel. Seconded by Ms. Gloff and unanimously voted.
DPW EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE; VACANT POSITION
Before the Board was a request to fill the vacancy of a mechanic welder in the Equipment Maintenance Division of the DPW.
Mr. Connolly questioned if this was a mandatory position and Ms. White responded that she thought so, noting that everyone knew how tight Tom Collins (Equipment Maintenance Supervisor) ran his operation and how innovative he was in keeping the vehicles operating. She thought Mr. Collins’ management of the division was cost effective and utilized the staff to the fullest.
Again Mr. Connolly asked if Ms. White felt comfortable that this was a needed position. Ms. White’s reply was, “absolutely”.
With what was happening at the state level, Ms. Van Amsterdam asked if this would be a position that would potentially have to be cut. The cuts to local aid weren’t known and she wondered how Ms. White was planning on looking at this position or any person looking to leave.
Ms. White responded that it would depend on the timing of the cuts. If the cuts happened at all, which she hoped they would not, and it was
approaching winter this would probably not be an area where she would look if she looked at the DPW at all. The DPW was down five people.
Mr. Ostroff encouraged members with questions to arrange with the Town Administrator a tour of the DPW and check out Equipment Maintenance. They kept vehicles on the road that were quite old.
Ms. Van Amsterdam responded that she wasn’t saying they didn’t keep vehicles on the road. Her question was broader than that. As we were heading into budgets, she was looking at the broader context.
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to authorize the filling of the vacant position for a mechanic welder in the DPW Equipment Maintenance division.
HISTORICAL COMMISSION: ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION
With regret, Mr. Connolly moved to accept the resignation of Helen Sheridan from the Historical Commission. Seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam and unanimously voted.
Ms. Sheridan’s resignation left a vacancy in the regular membership. Nancy Lavash, the longest serving associate member of the Historical Commission, had submitted a letter seeking appointment as a regular member.
On a motion by Mr. Connolly, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to appoint Nancy Lavash as a regular member of the Historical Commission to fill the vacancy left by Ms. Sheridan’s resignation.
Mr. Ostroff requested that the associate member position be posted.
CHANGES TO STATE CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAW
Ms. White informed the Board that the Legislature approved changes to the conflict-of-interest law. It was an important law and was important for employees and board members to have a clear understanding and abide by the law; however, the changes approved in her (Ms. White’s) view were completely unworkable. All municipal employees were subject and that includes every board and committee member and every employee whether paid or not paid regardless of how frequently they work; i.e. life guards at Dug Pond, the kids at Camp Arrowhead.
Each employee had to be provided with a summary of the conflict-of-interest law within 30 days of employment and annually afterward and certify they had received the law. That might be manageable. Where it got tricky was that all municipal employees must complete two online training sessions of the law – new employees within 30 days of hire and existing employees every two years. The Town Clerk must retain notices for six years. To Ms. White it was outrageous that a person that worked for the Town very briefly must take the time to complete two on line training programs.
If it could be done, Mr. Ostroff inquired as to what the Board/administration would like to see changed in the law.
Ms. White responded that she would characterize the on line training program as virtually impossible. By the time a seasonal employee was tracked down their employment was done.
Ms. Gloff pointed out that a lot of people still do not think on line and she was appalled the State set up something that required people to do something on line.
Mr. Ostroff suggested prioritizing the concerns. Ms. White characterized the online training program virtually impossible for seasonal employees. By the time seasonal employees were tracked down and implemented, the season was done. Even the sign off piece was very challenging. Committee members come and go. The Interim Town Clerk was very diligent in giving every appointee a copy of the conflict of interest law, but every employee and every board/committee member now had to be sent a summary of the conflict of interest law.
She felt the course of action should be appeal unless there was some assistance in administering it.
Mr. Ostroff asked if the Board wanted to have someone from the Ethics Commission come to a meeting, send a letter, or just have him consult with the MMA.
Mr. Connolly favored doing all of the above. He questioned how much money would have to be spent and if employees would have to be compensated. Ms. White advised that not everything had been worked out, but a training center would have to be set up.
Mr. Ostroff pointed out that Natick was not alone in this. He would like to do a little research, talk to the Town Administrator, and then do a follow up.
Ms. White noted that she was at a meeting last week of the area managers and all of the managers had the same reaction.
MATHWORKS SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: VACANCY
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Ms. Van Amsterdam, the Board unanimously voted to accept the resignation of Richard Houde from the MathWorks Scholarship Committee.
Staff was asked to post the vacancy.
MINUTES
On a motion by Ms. Gloff, seconded by Mr. Connolly, the Board unanimously voted to approve the minutes of the February 23, 2009 meeting.
WILSON MIDDLE SCHOOL WELLNESS TEAM: REQUEST PERMIT
A motion was made by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, to approve the request of the Wellness Team at Wilson Middle School to hold the Annual Family Race on October 18, 2009 in the Route 27, Pine Street, Oak Street area.
REYNOLDS AVENUE: REQUEST BLOCK PARTY
Ms. Van Amsterdam moved approval of Stephanie Albert’s request to close Reynolds Avenue on Sunday, October 18, 2009 from 2:00-5:00 p.m. (rain date October 25) for a block party. Seconded by Ms. Gloff and unanimously voted.
NATICK RECREATION & PARKS: SPOOKTACULAR
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to approve the use of the Common on October 31 from 12:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. for the annual Spooktacular.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to close Park Street from 12:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. on October 31, 2010 as part of the Spooktacular celebration.
On a motion by Ms. Van Amsterdam, seconded by Ms. Gloff, the Board unanimously voted to close Court Street from 2:00-3:00 p.m. for the parade and pumpkin smash.
SELECTMEN’S CONCERNS
- Friends of the Morse Institute
Ms. Gloff expressed her appreciation for all the support given to the Friends of the Morse Institute book sale. It was a record.
Ms. Van Amsterdam reported that the Audit Advisory Committee was moving forward and all members were very happy.
It was noted that the School Committee had not as yet submitted a letter naming their appointee to the Audit Advisory Committee
- DPW Director’s Retirement
Mr. Ostroff hoped DPW Director Charles Sisitsky would come before the Board soon so the Board could acknowledge him. Mr. Sisitsky has served this Town well for many years and earned a lot of respect and affection from his colleagues.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
________________________________
Kristine Van Amsterdam, Clerk
| 
