Vendor Justification

The Review Committee has chosen to bypass three (3) lower priced proposals for recommendation in favor of a more advantageous, though more expensive, proposer. Below lists the specific reasons for the choice. The proposal chosen (as submitted by Plante Moran) is most advantageous in that it has listed a complete team (unlike the Proscan proposal), has a complete scope of work (unlike the PIF proposal), features a better written, more complete and comprehensive proposal (as compared with the cheaper proposals), clearly outlines the scope of work in a manner Natick deems is more suitable to the project (unlike all other proposals), is not product specific (unlike the PIF proposal), and articulates a definitive timeline (unlike the Strategic Solutions Proposal)...

More detailed rankings on file with the Town.